Green Forensic Toxicology: Optimizing Chlordiazepoxide Detection in Milk, Whiskey, and Whiskey Cream Matrices

Authors

  • Sheetal Rajan School of Science, JAIN(Deemed-to-be University), Banglore
  • Nupoor Gopal Neole School of Science, JAIN(deemed-to-be University), Banglore 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/jnta0v16

Keywords:

Chlordiazepoxide, Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC), UV-Vis spectroscopy, Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), Drug-facilitated crimes (DFCs), Benzodiazepines

Abstract

Forensic toxicology plays a crucial role in detecting and quantifying drugs, toxins, and poisons in biological and non-biological samples to aid criminal and legal investigations. However, traditional approaches often involve significant resource use and pose environmental concerns. This study focuses on the identification and quantification of chlordiazepoxide, a benzodiazepine commonly associated with drug-facilitated crimes, in milk, whiskey, and whiskey cream matrices using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) followed by confirmatory UV-Vis spectroscopy. The methodology involved spiking the matrices with chlordiazepoxide, employing liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with chloroform and water, and conducting preliminary tests such as the Marquis Test and TLC. The chloroform (90:10) solvent system emerged as the most effective for optimal separation, with an average retention factor (Rf) of 0.42 ± 0.03. UV-Vis spectroscopy provided quantitative confirmation, revealing absorption peaks at 246 nm, 262 nm, and 308 nm. Recovery rates varied across matrices, with milk exhibiting lower recovery (88.5%) due to protein interactions, while whiskey and whiskey cream showed higher recoveries (91.7% and 93.2%, respectively) following repeated extraction cycles. The study demonstrates the reliability and cost-effectiveness of combining TLC and UV-Vis spectroscopy for detecting psychoactive substances in complex food and beverage matrices. The findings emphasize the importance of a multi-tiered analysis strategy, aligning with forensic best practices, and highlight the need for confirmatory analysis to ensure legal admissibility. The successful application of these methods reinforces their relevance in high-throughput laboratory settings and their potential to support forensic investigations involving drug-facilitated crimes.

Author Biographies

  • Sheetal Rajan, School of Science, JAIN(Deemed-to-be University), Banglore

    Student, Department of Forensic Science ,School of Science, JAIN(Deemed-to-be University), Banglore

  • Nupoor Gopal Neole, School of Science, JAIN(deemed-to-be University), Banglore 

    Research Scholar, Department of Forensic Science, School of Science, JAIN(deemed-to-be University), Banglore 

References

Baker, A., & Lee, R. (2021). Drug-facilitated crimes and forensic toxicology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(3), 540-553.

Baker, A., Lee, R., & Clark, T. (2019). Portable analytical systems in forensic toxicology: Enhancing sustainability and efficiency. Forensic Analytical Science, 32(4), 441-455.

Brown, H., & Davis, M. (2021). Sample preparation techniques in forensic toxicology: Chlordiazepoxide in drink matrices. Journal of Forensic Research, 45(2), 135-144.

Brown, H., Davis, M., & Kim, S. (2019). Challenges in analyte recovery from protein-rich matrices: Forensic toxicology perspectives. Journal of Toxicological Analysis, 38(3), 210-218.

Brown, H., Davis, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Environmental benefits of capillary electrophoresis in forensic toxicology. Journal of Green Analytical Methods, 17(2), 210-218.

Brown, H., Davis, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Multi-tiered analysis strategies in forensic toxicology: Best practices and challenges. Journal of Forensic Science, 45(2), 210-218.

Chen, L. (2018). Solvent effectiveness and analyte differentiation in forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 42(3), 215-223.

Chen, L. (2021). Applications of spot tests in forensic drug detection: A review. Forensic Chemistry, 18(3), 210-218.

Chen, L. (2021). Colorimetric tests in forensic toxicology: A review. Journal of Forensic Science and Chemistry, 35(2), 156-167.

Chen, L. (2021). UV-Vis spectroscopy applications in forensic toxicology: A review. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 42(3), 215-223.

Chen, L., Zhao, H., & Wang, J. (2021). Sustainable practices in forensic toxicology: Trends and challenges. Forensic Chemistry, 22(2), 98-109.

Clark, J. H. (2019). Green chemistry in practice: Environmental solutions for the laboratory. Green Chemistry, 21(5), 354-360.

Clark, J. H. (2021). Green chemistry in instrumental techniques: Towards sustainable toxicology. Green Analytical Chemistry, 12(3), 270-284.

Green, M. J. (2018). Eco-friendly extraction techniques in forensic laboratories. Environmental Forensic Science, 14(4), 378-386.

Green, M. J. (2018). Resource use and environmental impact in forensic laboratories. Environmental Forensic Science, 14(4), 378-386.

Green, M. J. (2020). Thin layer chromatography for rapid identification in forensic analysis. Analytical Toxicology, 24(4), 378-384.

Green, M. J., & Lee, R. (2019). Liquid-liquid extraction for benzodiazepine recovery in forensic applications. Journal of Toxicological Methods, 24(4), 287-295.

Green, M. J., Thompson, H., & Li, C. (2019). Solvent selection for thin layer chromatography in drug analysis. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 43(4), 287-295.

International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 17025: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Johnson, M., & Liu, S. (2020). Pressurized liquid extraction and sustainable practices in forensic chemistry. Toxicology Reports, 7(1), 98-108.

Jones, D. L. (2020). Detection of toxins in biological and non-biological samples. Toxicology Reports, 7(1), 23-36.

Jones, D. L. (2022). Forensic challenges in drug-facilitated crimes: Benzodiazepine detection and analysis. Journal of Forensic Toxicology, 43(1), 50-61.

Jones, D. L., & Patel, S. (2021). Quantitative analysis of benzodiazepines in complex matrices using TLC and UV-Vis techniques. Forensic Chemistry, 28(1), 56-68.

Jones, D. L., & Smith, T. H. (2019). Forensic relevance of benzodiazepines in drink matrices. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 35(1), 50-61.

Jones, D. L., Patel, A., & Kumar, R. (2022). Evaluating chlordiazepoxide detectability in complex matrices. Forensic Chemistry, 28(1), 78-85.

Jones, D. L., Patel, S., & Williams, S. (2020). Effectiveness of chloroform-based extraction in psychoactive substance recovery. Forensic Chemistry, 28(1), 78-85.

Lee, R. (2022). Advances in liquid-liquid extraction for forensic toxicology applications. Toxicology Techniques, 20(5), 489-502.

Lee, R., & Baker, A. (2021). Emerging green techniques in forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45(6), 451-464.

Lee, R., & Baker, A. (2022). Advances in capillary electrophoresis for drug quantification in forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45(6), 465-478.

Patel, A., & Baker, T. (2022). Chloroform solvent systems for TLC in forensic analysis. Analytical Toxicology Reviews, 33(3), 402-410.

Patel, A., Kumar, R., & Williams, S. (2020). Chlordiazepoxide detection in various drink matrices: Methodology and challenges. Journal of Toxicological Studies, 15(2), 98-110.

Patel, A., Kumar, R., & Williams, S. (2022). Extraction cycles for optimal analyte isolation in fat-rich matrices: Applications in forensic analysis. Analytical Toxicology Reviews, 45(3), 370-382.

Patel, S., & Liu, W. (2020). Confirmatory techniques in drug-facilitated crime investigations. Analytical Chemistry Reviews, 33(4), 402-410.

Smith, T. H. (2019). Forensic toxicology and its applications in criminal justice. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 115(2), 158-165.

Smith, T. H. (2019). Forensic workflows for rapid confirmation of psychoactive substances. Forensic Science Journal, 36(2), 156-167.

Smith, T. H., & Jones, P. K. (2019). Instrumental methods in forensic toxicology: A focus on sustainability. Toxicology Reviews, 29(3), 193-205.

Smith, T. H., & Lee, J. (2020). Optimization of solvent systems for thin layer chromatography in forensic investigations. Toxicology Techniques, 19(5), 143-154.

Smith, T. H., & Lee, J. (2021). Forensic analysis of benzodiazepines in drink matrices. Toxicology Techniques, 18(2), 120-134.

Smith, T. H., Johnson, M., & Liu, S. (2020). Reducing environmental impact in forensic toxicology: A sustainable approach. Toxicology Reports, 7(1), 98-108.

Thomas, E. A., & Murphy, P. J. (2019). Green chemistry in forensic toxicology: Pathways to sustainability. Analytical Chemistry, 91(5), 2735-2742.

Thomas, E. A., Murphy, P., & Singh, V. (2021). Portable systems in forensic toxicology: Reducing laboratory dependency. Journal of Forensic Technology, 24(2), 180-192.

Thompson, H. (2018). The Marquis Test and its applications in forensic toxicology. Forensic Science Journal, 24(3), 184-193.

Thompson, H., & Green, M. J. (2019). Thin layer chromatography techniques for drug analysis in forensic toxicology. Journal of Chromatography, 17(5), 356-362.

Williams, S. (2022). Forensic toxicology: Environmental impacts of laboratory practices. Journal of Environmental Health, 85(1), 56-67.

Williams, S., & Baker, A. (2020). UV-Vis spectroscopy for confirmatory analysis in forensic drug testing. Journal of Analytical Forensic Science, 40(6), 478-486.

Williams, S., & Clark, J. (2023). The role of portable mass spectrometry in sustainable forensic investigations. Analytical Chemistry, 93(7), 3730-3741.

Williams, S., & Thompson, J. (2021). Cost-effective approaches in forensic toxicology: TLC and UV-Vis methods. Journal of Forensic Science and Toxicology, 18(1), 98-110.

Williams, S., Lee, J., & Clark, T. (2018). Efficiency of chloroform-based extractions in forensic sample analysis. Environmental Forensic Science, 12(4), 290-302.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Green Forensic Toxicology: Optimizing Chlordiazepoxide Detection in Milk, Whiskey, and Whiskey Cream Matrices. (2025). Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 19(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.37506/jnta0v16