Is The Microlearning Approach A New Way to Influence Learners’ Attitudes Towards Nursing Bioscience Education?

Main Article Content

Snezana Kusljic
Aleksandra Kusljic

Abstract

Objective: Historically, nursing students have found bioscience subjects challenging and anxiety provoking. To alleviate
these factors, an online industry-based short course, Biochemical Basis for Human Life (BBHL) was developed. A survey
with narrative analysis was used to explore learners’ experience and satisfaction with the course and evaluate the
effectiveness of microlearning approach in delivering nursing bioscience education.
Methods: Learners enrolled in the short course and following the course completion, they were invited to submit the
End of Course Feedback survey. The survey included quantitative measures of course satisfaction, demographics
pertaining to learners’ country of origin and two open ended qualitative questions.
Results: A total of 444 learners were enrolled in the course, with 33.3% completion rate (148/444). Out of the learners
who completed the course, 89.9% (133/148) completed the End of Course Feedback survey. Across all questions,
agreement rates exceeded 90%, with negligible disagreement or nonresponse in relation to course satisfaction. Out of the
learners who provided a qualitative response, majority expressed positive attitudes towards course delivery and course
impact.
Conclusions: This study highlighted the beneficial nature of the course and its microlearning approach in relation
to nursing bioscience education. Furthermore, this study provides a new strategy for educators where a bite-sized
learning can be used as pre-classroom preparation for students to enhance student engagement and decrease burden
associated with extensive material coverage in the classroom.

Article Details

How to Cite
Is The Microlearning Approach A New Way to Influence Learners’ Attitudes Towards Nursing Bioscience Education?. (2026). International Journal of Nursing Education, 18(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.37506/nc646660
Section
Original Article
Author Biographies

Snezana Kusljic, Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville,
Victoria, Australia

Aleksandra Kusljic, BSci & MPH, Department of Nursing , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

BSci & MPH, Department of Nursing , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

How to Cite

Is The Microlearning Approach A New Way to Influence Learners’ Attitudes Towards Nursing Bioscience Education?. (2026). International Journal of Nursing Education, 18(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.37506/nc646660

References

Barton MJ, Bentley S, Craft J, Dupen O, Gordon C,

Cayanan EA, et al. Nursing students’ perceptions of

clinical relevance and engagement with bioscience

education: A cross-sectional study of undergraduate

and postgraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ

Today. 2021;99:104767.

Perkins C. Enhanced bioscience content is urgently

needed in UK pre-registration nursing curricula.

Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;34:7-11.

Craft J, Hudson P, Plenderleith M, Wirihana L, Gordon

C. Commencing nursing students’ perceptions

and anxiety of bioscience. Nurse Educ Today.

;33(11):1399-405.

Gordon CJ, Hudson PB, Plenderleith MB, Fisher M,

Craft JA. Final year Australian nursing students’

experiences with bioscience: A cross-sectional survey.

Nurs Health Sci. 2017;19(1):22-8.

Gresty KA, Cotton DR. Supporting biosciences in the

nursing curriculum: development and evaluation of

an online resource. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(4):339-49.

McVicar A, Andrew S, Kemble R. The ‘bioscience

problem’ for nursing students: an integrative review

of published evaluations of Year 1 bioscience, and

proposed directions for curriculum development.

Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(3):500-9.

Craft JA, Hudson PB, Plenderleith MB, Gordon CJ.

Registered nurses’ reflections on bioscience courses

during the undergraduate nursing programme: an

exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(11-12):1669-80.

Manchester KR, Roberts D. Bioscience teaching and

learning in undergraduate nursing education: A

systematic review with narrative synthesis. Nurse

Educ Pract. 2025;82:104226.

Satoh M, Fujimura A, Miyagawa S. Difficulties and

innovations in teaching anatomy and physiology in

nursing. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;67:103551.

Branney J, Priego-Hernandez J. A mixed methods

evaluation of team-based learning for applied

pathophysiology in undergraduate nursing education.

Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:127-33.

Davis GM. What is provided and what the registered

nurse needs--bioscience learning through the

pre-registration curriculum. Nurse Educ Today.

;30(8):707-12.

Clancy J, McVicar A, Bird D. Getting it right? An

exploration of issues relating to the biological sciences

in nurse education and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs.

;32(6):1522-32.

Van Wissen K, McBride-Henry K. Building

confidence: an exploration of nurses undertaking

a postgraduate biological science course. Contemp

Nurse. 2010;35(1):26-34.

Mortimer-Jones S, Fetherston C. The nursification of a

bioscience unit and its impact on student satisfaction

and learning in an undergraduate nursing degree.

Nurse Educ Today. 2018;64:1-4.

Saab MM, Hegarty J, Murphy D, Landers M.

Incorporating virtual reality in nurse education: A

qualitative study of nursing students’ perspectives.

Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105:105045.

Evensen AE, Brataas HV, Cui G. Bioscience learning in

nursing: a cross-sectional survey of beginning nursing

students in Norway. BMC Nurs. 2020;19:2.

O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. “Any other comments?”

Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus

to research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:25.

Ahearn A. Moving From 5% to 85% Completion

Rates for Online Courses: International Society for

Technology in Education (ISTE) and Association

for Supervision and Curriculum Development

(ASCD).2019 [updated 2019 June 6]. Available from:

https://www.edsurge.com/news

Celik B, Cagiltay K. Uncovering MOOC Completion:

A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from

Different Perspectives. Open Prax. 2024;16(3):445-56.

NMBA NaMBoA. Guidelines: For nurses applying for

endorsement as a nurse practitioner. 2025.

Choo CY, Rahim ASA. Pharmacy students’

perceptions and performance from a microlearningbased

virtual practical on the elucidation of absolute

configuration of drugs. Asian Journal of University

Education. 2021;17(4):1-10.

Fidan M. The effects of microlearning-supported

flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning

performance, motivation and engagement. Education

and Information Technologies 2023;28(10):12687-714.

Shabadurai Y, Chua FF, Lim TY. Investigating

the employees‘ perspectives and experiences of

microlearning content design for online training.

International Journal of Information and Education

Technology. 2022;12(8):786-93.

Mazlan CAN, Abdullah MH, Sulong MA, Abas A,

Ramdan MR, Safian AR, Fuad DRSM. Exploring the

integration of bite-sized learning: A scoping review

of research in education and related disciplines.

Contemp Educ Technol. 2023;15(4).

Monib WK, Qazi A, Apong RA. Microlearning

beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel

framework for improving learning outcomes. Heliyon.

;11(2):e41413.

Jensen KT, Knutstad U, Fawcett TN. The challenge

of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature

review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(9-10):1793-802.

Manchester KR, Roberts D. From classroom to clinic:

Bridging the gap in nursing anatomy and physiology

education. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024;75:103870.